Previous: The Gelman-King Model | Up: The Gelman-King Model | Next: Application: Calculating Partisan Bias |
Now that the parameters in each election year are estimated, the model can be simulated. For a predictive analysis, the hypothetical vote share in each district is found to be
where is a (possibly new) vector of predictors corresponding to those terms in . In this case, the two error terms are unidentifiable and once again combine so that
The term is added under the general uniform partisan swing assumption; that is, for small deviations from the observed outcome, a swing in the overall vote share can be represented as the same swing in each district in the system. This allows the user to investigate two scenarios: what would happen if the average vote were to shift by a small amount, or what the electoral map would look like with a particular average vote share (corresponding to a particular shift in the average vote.)
For an evaluation of an election's underlying properties, or to examine what would happen if we re-ran the election under counterfactual circumstances, we note that the systematic error component can be estimated using the data. Since and are simulated from the bivariate normal distribution,
we can obtain the conditional distribution,
We then use this estimate of in the simulation equation
Note that Party 1 wins the election if their share of the two-party vote is greater than one-half. Given and , we then see that the expected seat share is
To generate the probability distribution for this quantity, we then draw values for and given their conditional distributions, and set to its required value given the application.